Some Rural Co-ops Embrace Renewable Energy, Keep Rates Flat

CIN Admin
CIN Admin
  • Updated
Resource Type Article
Author / Source Kirsti Marohn (MPR News)
Publication Date January 2022
Location Minnesota; framework applicable nationally
Initiative Type Technology, Program
Project Complexity Intermediate
Recommended For Board, Staff

View Full Document

Estimated reading time: 15 minutes


Why This Matters for Rural Electric Co-ops

Falling costs for wind and solar are creating a real opening for rural co-ops to reduce dependence on fossil fuel-based wholesale power and protect members from price volatility. This article shows how co-ops that have invested in solar-plus-battery storage and demand response programs have managed to hold rates flat even as investor-owned utilities raised theirs.

Co-ops facing G&T contract constraints that limit self-generation will find the G&T relationship dynamics here directly relevant. Leaders can use this article to evaluate whether similar technology investments and member programs could strengthen their own affordability position.


Key Takeaways

Solar-plus-battery storage enables time-shifting energy use away from peak pricing periods, directly supporting rate stability for members.
G&T wholesale contracts often cap co-op self-generation. Renegotiating those caps is a live and consequential issue.
Opt-in demand response programs using smart thermostats and usage alerts can reduce peak costs while boosting member engagement.
Equipment inflation (transformers, copper wire) can erode rate stability even for well-managed co-ops. Proactive investment in rate-stabilizing technologies matters.

Implementation Considerations

  • Cost or Funding Requirements: Solar-plus-battery storage projects represent significant capital investment. Smaller co-ops may not have the balance sheet to develop projects independently and may need to pursue shared ownership, PPAs, or G&T-level procurement.
  • Regulatory or Governance Considerations: G&T wholesale contracts often cap how much power member co-ops can self-generate. Distribution co-ops should review their contracts and engage their G&T on cap structures before committing to local generation investments.

Notable Examples

  • Connexus Energy (MN): Pioneered Minnesota's first large-scale solar-plus-battery storage project. Has kept rates flat for five years through storage, demand response, and smart meter programs.
  • Great River Energy (MN): G&T cooperative selling Coal Creek Station coal plant and targeting 80% carbon emissions reduction by 2025. Is studying whether to raise the 5% self-generation cap for member co-ops.
  • Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric (MN): Built Minnesota's first community solar garden in 2013. Has since expanded member participation options without requiring PUC approval.
  • Lake Country Power (MN): Raising rates for the first time in six years due to supply chain costs and equipment price inflation, illustrating pressures co-ops without rate-stabilizing investments may face.

View Full Document

Estimated reading time: 15 minutes

Related to

Was this article helpful?

Comments

0 comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.