Current Practices in Distribution Utility Resilience Planning for Winter Storms

CIN Admin
CIN Admin
  • Updated
Resource Type Report
Author / Source Keen, Matsuda-Dunn, Krishnamoorthy, Clapper, Perkins, Leddy, and Grue (NREL/NLR)
Publication Date August 2024
Location United States
Initiative Type Program, Technology
Project Complexity Intermediate
Recommended For Board, Staff

View Full Document

Estimated reading time: 30+ minutes


Why This Matters for Rural Electric Co-ops

Winter storms are hitting co-ops in new ways, with ice forming in areas once too dry for it, heavier wet snow pulling vegetation into lines, and extreme cold driving generation shortfalls and load shedding for the first time. This report gives co-ops a structured, six-part framework and a ready-to-use rubric of questions for planning winter-storm resilience proactively, rather than reacting after a severe storm hits.

Two of the six utilities reviewed are co-op entities, Southwest Electric Cooperative (SWEC) and the Minnesota Rural Electric Association (MREA), so a co-op can see peer approaches directly. A co-op can use the rubric to self-assess its own plan, borrow the investment categories, and, following the Minnesota example, line up pre-hazard mitigation projects with cost-benefit analyses (CBA) to qualify for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding.


Key Takeaways

The framework's six components are hazard characterization, attribute metrics, performance metrics, threat risk analysis, investments, and investment prioritization, each paired with rubric questions for self-assessment.
Most utilities reviewed share the same gaps, including little forward-looking risk analysis and weak investment prioritization.
The report catalogs resilience investment categories, from vegetation management and undergrounding to microgrids, resilience hubs, and energy storage, usable as a menu.

Implementation Considerations

  • Cost or Funding Requirements: The report centers cost-benefit analysis for prioritizing investments and notes co-ops can line up pre-hazard mitigation projects with CBAs to qualify for FEMA hazard-mitigation funding, which requires an approved CBA.
  • Staffing or Technology Requirements: The rubric itself is low-cost to apply and a good starting point. Acting on gaps like forward-looking risk analysis or better metrics takes data, staff, or tools that smaller co-ops may need to build up or share regionally.
  • Time-Sensitive Information: The report is DOE-funded and references FEMA hazard-mitigation funding, both of which have been subject to federal changes. Confirm current FEMA program availability and DOE support before relying on those pathways.

Notable Examples

  • Southwest Electric Cooperative (SWEC): Missouri co-op that performs a full hazard characterization and multi-objective cost-benefit prioritization using STAPLEE factors.
  • Minnesota Rural Electric Association (MREA): Statewide association that made member co-ops eligible for FEMA funding through a hazard-mitigation annex and recommends pairing pre-hazard projects with cost-benefit analyses.
  • Austin Energy, Unitil, and Niagara Mohawk Power: Municipal and investor-owned utilities whose winter-storm resilience reports round out the review, including lessons from Winter Storm Uri.

View Full Document

Estimated reading time: 30+ minutes

Related to

Was this article helpful?

Comments

0 comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.